• Blogue
  • L'auteure
  • Services offerts
  • Ressources
  • Portfolio professionnel
  • ENGLISH
S'inspirer à apprendre

Collaborative Teacher Inquiry

1/17/2015

2 Comments

 
Photo
Picture
Have you ever heard of collaborative teacher inquiry?  Have you ever taken part in a collaborative teacher inquiry? Essentially, a collaborative teacher inquiry (en français) is a process in which you plan, act, observe and reflect as a group of educators.  In French, many educators refer to this process as the  co-co-co : co-planning, co-teaching and co-objectivation. Collaborative teacher inquiry “has been shown to be an effective means to both professional learning and to enhanced student learning” (Collaborative Inquiry in Ontario, Capacity Building Series, Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat, Ministry of Education of Ontario, p.1)

As a teacher, I hated collaborative teacher inquiry!  As a teacher lead, I dreaded collaborative teacher inquiry!  Now, as an educational consultant, collaborative teacher inquiry scares me!  Yet, I’m asked to participate in them constantly!  Why would you hate a practice that has been proven to be a great strategy for professional  growth and to enhance student learning, you are probably wondering?  Well, I believe the answer is quite simple: my experiences with collaborative teacher inquiry are not really positive.

I often measure the value of what I do or what I try in terms of “profit margin”... My husband works in the manufacturing industry and in that business: time is money.  Decisions are made, processes are designed based on profit margin.  If the profit margin is not big enough or potentially big enough, the process doesn’t cut it! This analogy reflects how I feel about collaborative teacher inquiry: so far, the profit margin has not been enough for me!

I’m not saying  that I can’t learn from taking part in a collaborative teacher inquiry with colleagues; I did learn, I do learn.  However, I have learned a lot more, in a lot less time, trying a new strategy with my students and getting their feedback. “Let’s try it again this way, let’s try something else now class; what do you think?”  And then, I would go back home, reflect on what my students did, did not do? I would research a little more on what I wanted to do or simply look for new ideas, adapt, modify and go back and try.  Sometimes, it was a huge success and I kept that strategy, that practice going.  Other times, well, it was a complete flop!  And that was ok!  We learned something! I would inquire more about it on the Internet (I loved the arrival of YouTube for example of modeling!), ask a colleague who had maybe tried  it or did something similar.  And, try again! 

I also feel that I have a much bigger “profit margin” learning every day, from emerging problems, situations in which I am immersed in than, if I can qualify them this way, the setup collaborative teacher inquiries I have been part of. I am one of those people who always have their learning antennas turned on. So, I would hear a comment in the lunch room and wonder: what could I do with that? I see an activity being done by another colleague and I ask questions: can you show me how you do that?  I would talk to a friend at the grocery store and think, mmmm, that could be interesting?  Who wants to go to that training: I will!  You are invited to come and see … ok, I will be there!  And now, with the richness of the educational universe open to us and the PLN we can develop … professional growth is exponential!  Really, I feel like I am in a collaborative peer inquiry every day!  And I love it! … Then, why am I still so uncomfortable with collaborative teacher inquiry?

Soon, I might have to facilitate a more “directed” collaborative teacher inquiry.  As I am preparing this professional development opportunity, I am asking myself : why don’t I have positive memories of the collaborative teacher inquiries I took part in?  Is it because I don’t have the right mindset? Is it because it suits a certain learning style that is not in tune with me?  Is it because I was often the teacher volunteering to do the lesson because I did not mind being watch and didn’t get enough time to observe?  Is it because I felt I did not get enough constructive comments?  Is it because I often felt that it wasn’t enough for me, I wanted to go farther? Maybe I was not relating enough to the subject of the inquiry, the observations we wanted to make?  My needs were not really fulfilled so I was disengaged?  Is it because I feel like am living a collaborative teacher inquiry every day that it does not feel as fulfilling to me?  Maybe the inquiry needs to be differentiated to meet the needs of everyone?  Maybe the format needed to be looked at and colleagues peered differently? Inquiry is a strategy for professional growth, maybe it just was not the most efficient strategy for the learning we wanted to do?  All of those? A  few of those factors together?  None? Something else?

Soon, I will have to facilitate collaborative professional growth sessions with a group of teachers.  I want our experience to be positive.  I want us to feel that the time we spend is well worth it. I want us to grow as professionals. I want us to enhance the learning of our students.  How can I make sure  to make this experience a positive one for the educators I work with and for myself as well?  I would love to hear from you to help me facilitate this positive learning experience : tips, past experiences we can build on, strategies … ?

I will make sure to write about my experiences.  Stay tuned!


2 Comments
Tim Robinson link
1/18/2015 03:42:57

Hi Johanne,

We're just started to do a few CI projects at my school and they haven't been too bad. I find the more top down oriented they are, the harder sell. The real challenge is to get them to be "horizontal."

I came across a really great bit of advice in some Fullan book, I can't remember which one, probably "The Principal." He suggested asking staff to come up with ideas on why the thing being introduced is a bad idea. There's usually a lot of insight and important points that are unfortunately smothered in cynicism, with an icing of niceness on top. So teachers won't actually say the negative thoughts out loud in the sessions, as that would feel impolite, but grumble about them afterwards or make side comments to the person sitting beside them.

Fullan suggests that if you 'validate dissent' you can get all those important discussion points on the table without the person feeling at risk or that they are being rude. He submitted the idea of splitting the session into two random groups. Group A needs to think of all the reasons why this new thing will be good for the school. Group B needs to think of all the reasons why this might not be the best for our school. I imagine there's a whole variety of other protocols that could be used to validate dissent, perhaps each small group or partners could come up with 5 pros, and 5 cons or something.

Afterwards, a genuine discussion can take place about how this will actually improve the school. Teachers feel more respected that their voices and concerns and now that they've 'named their demons' out loud, they lose the same sort of emotional power they once had. They are then able to talk freely about getting the best out of the new program, initiative, CI thing, or whatever it is.

I haven't tried this myself yet, but I'd like to. I think it could be pretty powerful in encouraging real discussion. I think it might be a good idea to frame the thinking ahead of time by getting everyone to agree on the fact that we're there for the best interests of the students, and use that as a starting point and purpose to the discussion.

Reply
Johanne Ste-Croix
1/18/2015 20:00:27

Thanks Tim for replying to my blog post. I appreciate your insight.

Teachers’ voice, try to get CI projects to be horizontal (indeed very challenging, but worth our best efforts for sure) and a common purpose: best interest of our students and/or enhance our students’ learning I might add … I’m jotting these down on my thinking/planning canvas right now!

This strategy to bring about genuine discussion proposed by Fullan certainly piques my interest. I will definitely have to read more about it. Thanks for sharing this! I will let you know how it goes if I’m able to give it a try.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Auteure

    Agente de changement en éducation (je l'espère!), passionnée de et par l'apprentissage!
    Maman x4, conseillère pédagogique Lead,  amie, enseignante de formation, leader, entrepreneure, mentor, coach de vie, rédactrice, formatrice, consultante en andragogie et en pédagogie... j'adore la bonne bouffe!
     
    Pourquoi un blogue?
    Pour apprendre, pour réfléchir, pour partager, pour collaborer, pour réseauter.

      Liste d'envoi

    Inscris-toi!

    RSS Feed

    Tweets de @JohanneSteCroix

    Categories

    All
    30 Jours De Blogues
    Activités D'apprentissage
    Apprentissage Continu
    Développement Professionnel
    Développement Professionnel
    Engagement
    Évaluation
    Outils Technologiques
    Pensée Critique
    Ressources Pédagogiques
    Rétroaction
    Rétroaction
    Strateacutegies-dapprentissage
    Strateacutegies-denseignement
    Voix-des-eacutelegraveves
    Voix-des-eleves
    Voix-des-eleves230b62ecc2

    Archives

    September 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

Services

Présentations
Coaching
Ateliers et formations en coaching

Compagnie

À propos de Johanne 

​Visitez moi aussi au site
www.joltagui.com

Contactez-moi

[email protected]

© COPYRIGHT 2016. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.